Legal Opinion

Herbster Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1958No. Appeal, No. 38PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an appeal by claimant from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming the referee and denying compensation on the ground that claimant’s unemployment was due to voluntarily leaving work without cause of a compelling and necessitous nature within the meaning of section 402 (b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802 (b).1

Claimant had worked for the American Viscose Corporation since 1929, and was a member of the Textile Workers Union of America, C.I.O., which had a labor-management agreement with the employer. His last day…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Campbell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Missouri Division of Employment Security v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Hamburg Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Murray Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. G. C. Murphy Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. St. Joseph Health Center v. Missouri Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API