Legal Opinion

Means Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1955No. Appeal, 258PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This is an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying compensation because of ineligibility under Section 402(b) of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Law. The facts are undisputed. Claimant began to work for the Elliott Company in November 1951 and continued until May 5, 1954. Her last working day was April 20, on which date she received two weeks’ vacation pay and began her vacation on April 21. She was married April 24, 1954. At the end of her vacation period she was refused permission to return to work although willing and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Prentice v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Elliott Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Rzepski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API