Legal Opinion

Moudry v. Witzka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1903No. Nos. 13,466—(38)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Le Sueur county, Cadwell, J., overruling a general demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

This action is to set aside a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury in a previous suit upon the ground that it was obtained by perjury. A general demurrer questioning the sufficiency of the-complaint was interposed, which was overruled’ From this order,, defendant appeals.

The complaint now before us sets forth much that is immaterial to the disposition of this appeal, and it is only essential on this-review to refer to the facts in the pleading reviewed which are-determinative of the conclusion we have reached.

The defendant here previously brought an action against this-, plaintiff for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hass v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Geisberg v. O'LaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Stewart v. DuncanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. O'Brien v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Watkins v. LandonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. In Re Estate of JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Prickett v. Duke Power Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
  4. Young v. LindquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Hayward v. LarrabeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API