Prickett v. Duke Power Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER-
DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.
Contending that in an earlier action in this Court brought by the plaintiffs against -the defendant, the defendant had secured a summary judgment on the basis of what plaintiffs argue were false or perjured affidavits, the plaintiffs sue in fraud. The defendant has now moved for summary judgment in this action. After the filing of the motion for such summary judgment, the plaintiffs asked leave to amend to ask for the re-opening under Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, (28 U.S.C.), of the earlier judgment of this Court.
The motion of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Southern Rambler Sales, Inc. v. American Motors Corporation and American Motors Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Gray v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Great Coastal Express, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Ofamerica, Great Coastal Express, Inc., Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Ofamerica, Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Great Coastal Express, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers OfamericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Great Coastal Express, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Chrysler Corp. v. Superior Dodge, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- Armour & Co. v. NardDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1972
- Whitlock v. Midwest Acceptance Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.