Legal Opinion

Yates v. J. H. Krumlinde & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1937No. Civ. 10383PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment for personal injuries entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury.

Plaintiff and respondent had previously been employed by appellant J. H. Krumlinde & Company, a copartnership, and on August 7, 1934, he went to the plant of the copartnership in San Francisco, seeking reemployment. He was not employed that day but rode to South San Francisco with appellant Lotti, one of the members of the copartnership, upon a truck driven by Lotti and in South San Francisco received the injuries for which judgment was entered in this action.

One…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Walker v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Ivancich v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Strong v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ray v. HanischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Ketchum v. PatteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Rayner v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Duclos v. TashjianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Melcher v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API