Scruggs v. Cotterill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1219 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
From the facts stated in the submission it appears that the plaintiff and William L. Yandervoort, deceased, were associated together *584■in the dry goods business-, at Sk Louis, Mo., and had been for forty-years and upwards, first as partners, and. afterwards as a corporation under the name of Scruggs, Yandervoort & Barney Dry Goods Company, to.which corporation the property and business of the partnership was transferred. The stock of the corporation was-divided into 5,000 shares, of $100 each; of which stock Scruggs-held 3,000 shares, and Yandervoort and Barney each 1,000. Barney…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamer v. . SidwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Mactier's Administrators v. FrithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
- Bomeisler v. . ForsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Healy v. HealyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Wilson v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Normile v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Storer v. RipleyNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Lane v. AlbertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.