Cohen v. Rosenstock Motors, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSohreiber, J.
This action is by the purchaser for specific performance of a contract of sale of a new motor car. Defendant *427moves under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, the contention being that the allegations do not make out a case in which specific performance will lie.
Section 149 of the Personal Property Law (Uniform Sales Act, § 68) provides; “ Where the seller has broken a contract to deliver specific or ascertained goods, * * * a court of equity may, if it thinks fit, on the application of the buyer, by its judgment or decree, direct that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Glick v. BeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Verzani v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Goodman v. Henry Caplan, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946
- Fortner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- McCallister v. PattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Maas v. WeitzmanNew York Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.