Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Rosenstock Motors, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSohreiber, J.

This action is by the purchaser for specific performance of a contract of sale of a new motor car. Defendant *427moves under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, the contention being that the allegations do not make out a case in which specific performance will lie.

Section 149 of the Personal Property Law (Uniform Sales Act, § 68) provides; “ Where the seller has broken a contract to deliver specific or ascertained goods, * * * a court of equity may, if it thinks fit, on the application of the buyer, by its judgment or decree, direct that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Glick v. BeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Verzani v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Goodman v. Henry Caplan, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Fortner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. McCallister v. PattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Maas v. WeitzmanNew York Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API