Vinson v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
The plaintiff in a suit for sexual harassment and intentional infliction of severe emotional distress petitions for a writ of mandate and/or prohibition to direct respondent court to forbid her pending psychiatric examination, or in the alternative to protect her from any inquiry into her sexual history, habits, or practices. She also requests that her attorney be allowed to attend the examination if it is held. We conclude that the examination should be permitted but that a writ should issue to restrict its scope. We further conclude that her counsel should not be present.
Plain…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
- John B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- James J. Acosta, Sr. v. Tenneco Oil Company and Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.