Legal Opinion

White v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 9, 1994No. CA CR 93-1117PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge. Appellants,

Michael White and Virginia White, were convicted by a jury of possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, and possession of an illicit whiskey still. On appeal, appellants argue that the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress the fruits of an illegal search and that the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions. We disagree and affirm.

The record reflects that a search warrant was executed for appellants’ residence. During the search, police collected marijuana, “roaches,” roach clips, and rolling paper. A whiskey…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Ottens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Ilo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Gilbert v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Newborn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API