Franklin v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.
Appellant, Marcus Antonio Franklin, was convicted in a bench trial of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and maintaining a drug premises. His sole point on appeal is that there is insufficient evidence to sustain the convictions because there is no evidence linking him to drugs found in a house in which he was a joint occupant. We agree and reverse both convictions.
Franklin was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and maintaining a drug premises. Two Little Rock detectives testified at his bench trial on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Plotts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Cary v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Parette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Darrough v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. LaPlanteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- State v. LaplanteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Nikki Leann Knauls v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Harjo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.