Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1998No. CA CR 97-486PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

Appellant, Marcus Antonio Franklin, was convicted in a bench trial of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and maintaining a drug premises. His sole point on appeal is that there is insufficient evidence to sustain the convictions because there is no evidence linking him to drugs found in a house in which he was a joint occupant. We agree and reverse both convictions.

Franklin was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and maintaining a drug premises. Two Little Rock detectives testified at his bench trial on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Plotts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Cary v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Parette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Darrough v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. LaPlanteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. State v. LaplanteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Nikki Leann Knauls v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  5. Harjo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API