Bailey v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and of possession of drug paraphernalia. He appeals and argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain the verdict. There is no merit in the argument and, accordingly, we affirm.
Appellant and his co-defendant, Tiffany Mitchell, were arrested when police searched the house they were occupying and found drugs and drug paraphernalia. The testimony introduced at appellant’s trial is as follows. Three police officers went to the residence located at 320 North Laurel in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Plotts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Cary v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Osborne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Bernadyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Littlepage v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Stanton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.