Legal Opinion

City of Scottsbluff v. Employers Mutual Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2003No. S-02-398PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

NATURE OF CASE

The City of Scottsbluff is suing for coverage under the insurance contract it has with Employers Mutual Insurance Company (EMC). On September 3, 1999, Scottsbluff experienced a large amount of rainfall. On that day, several homeowners sustained water and sewage accumulation in their basements and consequently sued the city for damages. Responding to a request from the city, EMC refused to cover these damages and refused to supply the city a defense, alleging that the damages fell within an exclusion of the insurance contract. The city and some of the homeowners settled the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. CalingerNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. NEFF TOWING SERVICE v. US Fire Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Finch v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poulton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Miller v. SteichenNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cornhusker Casualty Co. v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API