Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Calinger

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2003No. S-02-565PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

In this appeal, we decide whether an agreement reached before the issuance of an insurance policy can provide coverage when the terms of the agreement are contrary to the express terms of the policy later issued to the insured. Continental Casualty Company (CNA) sought a declaratory judgment holding that CNA was not required to provide coverage for Walter M. Calinger for a $1.5 million judgment rendered against him. In his answer and counterclaim, Calinger alleged that the terms of the insurance contract were provided by a letter from his insurance broker rather than by the policy language.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rodine v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Day v. HellerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Francis v. v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Meyer Natural Foods LLC v. Greater Omaha Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. NEBCO, INC. v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Broad v. Randy Bauer Ins. AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Meyer Natural Foods v. Greater Omaha Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API