Legal Opinion

Miller v. Steichen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2004No. S-03-226PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

The district court for Douglas County entered a judgment in the amount of $325,000 in favor of Deanna Wright Miller against John P. Steichen in this professional liability action. The issues presented in this appeal involve a garnishment proceeding against Coregis Insurance Company, Inc. (Coregis), which is alleged to have issued a professional liability insurance policy providing coverage for Miller’s claim against Steichen. A default judgment was entered against Coregis, which it unsuccessfully challenged by special appearance and by a motion to vacate. In this appeal, Coregis contends that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Lincoln Meadows Homeowners Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Interest of Rondell B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Beren Corp. v. SpaderNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Crosby v. LuehrsNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Beliveau v. GoodrichNebraska Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Friedman v. FriedmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Fokken v. SteichenNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co. v. Oceanside Laundry, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State on Behalf of AE v. BuckhalterNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Applied Underwriters v. Oceanside LaundryNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API