Legal Opinion

Grinnell Brothers v. Moy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1925No. Docket No. 17PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

On February 7, 1922, plaintiff sold a piano and bench to defendant Moy, receiving the following instrument:

“February 7, 1922.
“$655.00.
“For value received, I promise to pay to the order of Grinnell Brothers, at their store, 245-247 Woodward avenue, Detroit, Michigan,
“Six hundred fifty-five dollars as follows: $100.00 cash, Feb. 7, 1922, balance in monthly installments of fifty or more dollars each commencing March 7, 1922, with interest annually at six (6) per cent.

Inst. Premier Style, Grand No. 27464 with bench; Residence: 28 W. Adams.

“I hereby agree, that the title to the above described…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. MacQueen v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Wood v. Holly Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Burton v. KochMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Peter Schuttler Co. v. GuntherMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Allegan v. Consumers' Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  2. People v. StimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Kates v. ReadingMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Gammons v. ShaferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Contractors Equipment Co. v. ReasnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API