Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1981No. 60294PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for possession of heroin. Punishment, enhanced by allegation and proof of two prior felony convictions, is life.

The first ground of error relates to the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to require disclosure of the name of the informant who supplied information leading to the issuance of the search warrant in this case. The established rule is that disclosure is not required

“unless (1) the informant participated in the offense; (2) was present at the time of the offense or arrest; (3) was otherwise shown to be a material witness…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Lippert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Warford v. Childers, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API