Legal Opinion
Warford v. Childers
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided October 22, 1982No. 07-81-0124-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COUNTISS, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying a Rule 215a motion 1 to require a deponent to answer certain questions. We affirm.
The case before this court is ancillary to a suit pending in another jurisdiction. Appellants J. Albert Warford and JoAnne Stevens are plaintiffs in a civil suit in the State of Hawaii against Sonny Arnold, Sue War-ford and various other persons. In the Hawaii suit, Mr. Warford and Mrs. Stevens seek over eleven million dollars in damages and other relief from the various defendants because of the murder of Mr. Warford’s son, Paul Roger Warford, and Mrs.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Pope v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Allen v. HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Barker v. DunhamTexas Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
- America Online, Inc. v. Anonymous Publicly Traded Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Pelt v. State Board of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Valley Baptist Medical Center v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Warford v. Beard, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.