Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1888No. 14,192PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

The grand jury in and for the county of Lake returned an indictment into the Lake Circuit Court, in which they presented George Taylor for having unlawfully sold intoxicating liquor to one Charles Scherer, a minor.. The indictment was signed by “ Thaddeus S. Fancher, deputy prosecuting attorney.” It is insisted that the court erred in overruling a motion to quash, because the indictment was not signed by the prosecuting attorney, as required by section 1669, R. S. 1881.

In Hamilton v. State, 103 Ind. 96, it is said to be an open question in this State whether the failure of the prosecuting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dukes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Hamilton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Vanderkarr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Heacock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Knight v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. WinneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API