Hamer v. State

The only question sought to be presented by this record is whether the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to quash the affidavit on which he was tried and convicted of the crime of transporting intoxicating liquors in an automobile in violation of §2720 Burns 1926. Appellant contends that the indorsement on the affidavit was insufficient, it being as follows: “Approved by me this 19th day of September 1925. C. C. Rumer, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney.”

Section 2151 Burns 1926 provides that, “when such affidavit has been made . . . the prosecuting attorney shall approve the same by…