Heacock v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.
This was an indictment for seduction. There was a motion to quash the indictment overruled.
After trial and conviction, there was a motion in arrest -.of judgment made and overruled, and exception^ taken, at the *394proper time, to each of ^hese rulings. Each of these motions should have been sustained.
Sec. 16, 2 G. & H. 394: “Each juror must take the usual oath. The court must plainly instruct them as to their duty. An indictment may be found by any nine. It must be indorsed by the foreman, ‘A true bill.—A. B. foreman,’ returned into open court, and filed by the clerk.'”
Sec. 17, on same page:…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- M'Gregg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
- Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Sawyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Conner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clare v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Hamilton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Hoover v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Trueblood v. HollingsworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Vanderkarr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.