Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1885No. 12,533PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The indictment in this- case, with all the usual and necessary formality, charged the appellant, Hamilton, with having, on the 10th day of January, 1885, sold to ■one Beard intoxicating liquor, in a less quantity than a quart at a time, to wit, one gill of such liquor, at and for the price and sum of ten cents, without a license to so sell intoxicating liquor. The indictment was a printed blank with the term •of court, date, name of appellant, and charging part filled in with a pen, and the name of the prosecuting attorney, with the title of his office annexed, printed at the bottom instead…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dukes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Arbintrode v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Stout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Heacock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Feigel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pursley v. HischIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Cummings v. LandesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Deep River National Bank's Appeal From CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  4. City of Gary v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Stork v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API