Legal Opinion

Milton W. GARNATZ, Appellee, v. STIFEL, NICOLAUS & CO., INC., and Kingsley O. Wright, Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1977No. 77-1048PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Senior Circuit Judge.

Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., a brokerage firm, and Kingsley 0. Wright, a vice-president of that firm, appeal from a judgment entered against them on a jury verdict awarding Milton W. Garnatz damages of $45,000 with interest and costs. Count I of plaintiff’s complaint was based on defendants’ alleged violations of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b); Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5; and § 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q. Count II of the complaint was a pendent state claim for common law fraud.

Defe…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Abram Chasins v. Smith, Barney & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Randall v. LoftsgaardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Martin v. FeilenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Silverberg v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Willard Crimm v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,535 Harold Harris v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API