Legal Opinion
in all Winstar-Related Cases at the Court v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 20, 1999No. 90-8 CPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON ISSUES RELATED TO FDIC INTERVENTION
TURNER, Judge.1
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), by motion filed on November 12, 1996, sought to intervene as party-plaintiff and substitute itself as sole party-plaintiff in 43 ‘Winstar-related” cases2 which involved failed thrift institutions. The motion was vigorously opposed by existing plaintiffs *5in the affected eases. Issues raised by the motion were extensively briefed and were argued on January 28 and 30, 1997.
At the conclusion of'oral argument on January 30,1997, “tentative” rulings were made, subject to refinement after…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Total Medical Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Dr. Ben Branch, Trustee of Bank of New England Corporation, Derivatively and on Behalf and in the Name of Maine National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- First Hartford Corp. Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Landmark Land Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Castle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.