Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1952No. 14047_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

Appealing from a judgment remitting as to appellee, claimant below, the forfeiture of a Dodge Truck, but taxing the costs against the claimant, 1 the United States is here insisting that the court erred in remitting the forfeiture.

The primary reason assigned by it is that the evidence showed, and the court found, that, though the ostensible purchaser of the car and maker of the paper purchased by claimant was without any record or reputation as a violator, one who had such a record was a secret owner of a part interest in the car.

The secondary reason was: that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. Automobile Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Finance & Thrift Corporation, of One 1954 Model Mercury Coach Automobile, Motor No. 54sl71421m v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Intervenor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. One 1955 Model Buick Coupe AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API