Legal Opinion

General Finance & Thrift Corporation, of One 1954 Model Mercury Coach Automobile, Motor No. 54sl71421m v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1955No. 15621_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

Appealing from an order denying its ■claim, as a protected lienor 1 under Sec. •3617, 18 U.S.C., for remission of forfeiture, claimant is here insisting that the •order was based upon findings of fact, which are without support in the record, and conclusions of law, which are at variance with the decided cases. For the reasons hereafter briefly stated, we agree.

The cause was submitted below upon a stipulation of facts which not only showed that Claude M. Fain, on the face of the papers the ostensible purchaser of the automobile, had no record or reputation as a handler…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. Automobile Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. United States v. One 1938 Model Chevrolet Coach, Motor No. 1427089, West Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. United States v. One 1949 Chevrolet Coach Motor No. Gaa953083Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. Farrior Motor Co. IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1961 Oldsmobile, 4-Door SedanDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  2. United States v. One 1955 Model Buick Coupe AutomobileDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1956
  3. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. One 1959 Pontiac Bonneville 2-Door SedanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API