Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Intervenor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1957No. 16455PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

The district court, having on full findings of fact and of law 1 and on the authority of Beaudry v. United States, 5 Cir., 106 F.2d 987, United States v. Williams, 5 Cir., 200 F.2d 500, and other cases cited by him, ordered the automobile forfeited, appellant is here insisting that the decision and judgment were wrong and must be reversed.

The United States, on its part, urging upon us that the decision was right throughout, insists that whether this is so or not, the judgment forfeiting the automobile and denying remission was right and must be affirmed unless an abuse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. Beaudry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Real Prop. L. at 2011 Calumet, HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1988
  2. United States v. One 1959 Pontiac Bonneville 2-Door SedanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API