Legal Opinion

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Richardson

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 20, 1970No. Civ. A. 3946PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATCHUM, District Judge.

In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (“PMA”), on behalf of its members, seeks a preliminary injunction restraining the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (“the Secretary”) and the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (“the Commissioner”) from taking any action in relianee upon the regulations promulgated in the Commissioner’s Order of May 8, 1970 (“the May regulations”), 35 Fed.Reg. 7250. The defendants oppose the issuance of a preliminary injunction and also move for summary judgment of dismissal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Usv Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare and Commissioner of Food & Drugs, No.24900Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Pfizer, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. American Public Health Association v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API