Legal Opinion
American Public Health Association v. Veneman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 23, 1972No. Civ. A. 1847-70PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BRYANT, District Judge.
I
Before the court are the cross-motions of the parties for summary judgment. Because of the complex nature of this case, a detailed recitation of the facts is appropriate.
In 1962, the Congress amended the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 to require that all drugs on the market be proven effective for their suggested use. 1 Under 21 U.S.C. § 355(e) (1970),
The Secretary shall, after due notice and opportunity for a hearing to the applicant, withdraw approval of an application with respect to any drug under this section if the Secretary finds . . . (3) on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pfizer, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Ass'n v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mimi Cutler, Stephen D. Annand and National Council of Senior Citizens v. Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Larry Leon Chaney v. Margaret M. Heckler, as Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Cutler v. KennedyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc. v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Consumer Federation of America v. Upjohn CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.