Legal Opinion
State v. Rambousek
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1984No. Cr. 1017PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The State appeals from an order of the County Court of Stark County suppressing the results of a Breathalyzer test administered to Timothy Rambousek. Rambousek has filed a motion with this Court to dismiss the State’s appeal. We deny the motion and reverse the county court’s suppression order.
On January 1, 1984, at about 1:40 a.m., Rambousek was stopped by North Dakota Highway Patrolman Steven Kirchoffner while driving on a highway. Officer Kir-choffner administered certain field sobriety tests after which he placed Rambousek under arrest for driving while under the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Palmer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. DiscoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- McNamara v. Director of North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. DresslerNorth Dakota Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. MessnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Grand Forks v. RisserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.