Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Cincinnati v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1948No. 31233PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The question here made is whether, under the facts alleged in the petition, there is a clear legal duty imposed upon the Public Utilities Commission to set aside and expunge from its files the emergency rate order fixing interim gas rates for the city of Cincinnati pending appeals by The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company from ordinances fixing gas rates in that city.

It is clear that mandamus will not lie to set aside or expunge .an order of the commission unless the law specifically enjoins such action, cannot be invoked to control the discretion of the commission, and will not issue in. any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Toledo Theatres & Realty Co. v. FultonOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Pub. Util. Cm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State ex rel. Kay v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API