Legal Opinion
City of Akron v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1933No. 23922PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
The city of Akron claims that the Public Utilities Commission has jurisdiction to grant this change in rate by virtue of Section 614-32, General Code, which reads as follows:
“The commission shall have power, when deemed by it necessary to prevent injury to the business or interests of the public or any public utility of this state in case of any emergency to be judged by the commission, to temporarily alter, amend, or with the consent of the public utility concerned suspend any existing rates, schedules or order relating to or affecting any public utility or part of any public utility in this…
2Cited by10 opinions
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Joseph Bros. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
- Complaint of Residents of Struthers v. Ordinance No. 87-8482Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Shimko v. LobeOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.