State Ex Rel. Toledo Theatres & Realty Co. v. Fulton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The three foregoing eases present similar features, and were heard together. Each of them is an action in mandamus instituted in this court, seeking an order compelling the superintendent of hanks to pay to the several relators certain specific amounts which are claimed by the relators, as resulting from trust funds deposited with each individual bank, and later commingled with its general assets. In each case, the petition alleges that the relator had no adequate remedy at law. For the purpose of this decision, it is not necessary to allude to the facts contained in the several…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Fulton, Supt. v. GardinerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. City of Cincinnati v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- American Express Co. v. Commercial Sav Bank & Tr Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Gardiner v. Fulton, Supt. of BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 1932