High v. Reading Transit Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
By this appeal we are asked to say that the court below erred in declining to enter judgment for the defendant notwithstanding a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $608.65 as damages for injuries to his automobile and the temporary loss of its use, arising out of an accident in which the automobile was struck by a trolley car operated by an employe of defendant.. The appellant transit company has a single track on 10th Street, a north and south street, forty feet in width between curbs, in the City of Reading, upon which it operates cars in a. northerly direction.
On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Robb v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Lamont v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Gilmore v. Federal Street & Pleasant Valley Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Natvig v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rice v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Sharpe v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Vivino v. NeviusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930