Legal Opinion

Rice v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1959No. Appeal, No. 268PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Musmanno,

Charles Rice, the plaintiff in this case, was injured when his automobile was struck by a street car of the defendant Philadelphia Transportation Company. The jury returned a verdict of $20,000, and the defendant company moved for judgment n.o.v., charging contributory negligence. It also moved in the alternative for a new trial on the ground of excessive verdict. The lower court refused both motions and the defendant appealed.

Reading the record through the eyes of the jury, which resolved all contradictions, doubts, and ambiguities in favor of the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bochar v. J. B. Martin Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. McClintock v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Natvig v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. McGavern v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. High v. Reading Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Robinson v. Greeley & HansenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Carminati v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. James Earston Wiles v. New York, Chicago and st.louis Railroad Company, a Corporation, James Earston Wiles v. New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  5. Krakar v. Don Swart Trucking, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API