Legal Opinion

Oregon State Parks & Recreation v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1989No. LUBA 88-044; CA A51009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

City of Portland (city) seeks review of LUBA’s order remanding its Goal 15 exception and comprehensive plan map amendment. City’s decisions permitted an addition to a restaurant deck, including a public observation area with public access, in the Willamette River Greenway setback area. Section 33.77.150(A)(3) of the city code allows an exception to Goal 15 for non-river dependent or related uses in the area if the “use will provide a significant public benefit.” See also Portland City Code § 33.77.035(A); Allen v. City of Portland, 87 Or App 459, 742 P2d 701 (1987), rev den 305 Or 103 (1988).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cusma v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Allen v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Canfield v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Eckis v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API