Legal Opinion

Smith v. Town of Wolfeboro

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 10, 1992No. 90-603PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The Town of Wolfeboro (the town) and the Wolfeboro Planning Board (the board) appeal from a decision of the Superior Court (Temple, J.) involving a subdivision owned by Charles H. Smith and Richard D. Kourian (the owners). The court reversed the *340board’s decision to reconfigure lot 3 in the owners’ subdivision and to deny the owners’ application for certification of lot 3 as suitable for residential development. The court awarded damages for a temporary taking but denied the owners’ request for attorney’s fees. The owners cross appeal for an award of fees. We reverse the superior court’s award…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Burrows v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. Bassett v. Salisbury Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1862

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Pheasant Bridge Corp. v. Township of WarrenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Dumont v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Chioffi v. City of WinooskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Sea Cabins on the Ocean IV Homeowners Ass'n v. City of North Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API