Lingo v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Lingo v. State, 138 Ohio St.3d 427,
2014-Ohio-1052.] LINGO ET AL.; GLICK, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF OHIO ET AL.; WOHL, CLERK, APPELLEE. [Cite as Lingo v. State, 138 Ohio St.3d 427,
2014-Ohio-1052.] Courts—Judgments—Declaratory judgment is not proper vehicle for determining whether previously adjudicated rights were properly adjudicated—Court of common pleas may not vacate judgment of municipal court—Void judgments may be attacked at any time—A court has inherent authority to vacate its own void judgments. (No. 2012-1774—Submitted September 10, 2013—Decided March 25, 2014.) APPEAL from…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ThreattOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Schwarzmer v. MazzoneOhio Supreme Court · 2025