Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 5, 2003No. A113089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a July 2000 order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) setting a new release date and imposing as a condition of parole that petitioner pay restitution imposed as the result of a conviction arising out of a separate case. We reverse the board’s order of restitution and otherwise affirm.

In 1987, petitioner was convicted of burglary in the first degree and conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree for crimes that occurred in 1985 and 1986. The court imposed restitution as part of the sentence in the burglary case. However, no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haskins v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Bollinger v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Patin v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunmire v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Miller v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API