Legal Opinion

Patin v. State Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 25, 1989No. CA A51187PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner appeals a Board of Parole order that states, in part:

“DISCHARGE OF PAROLE PRIOR TO SENTENCE EXPIRATION DATE IS CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF PAROLE, FOLLOWING A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PAROLE OFFICER AND PAYMENT IN FULL OF ANY RESTITUTION OWING.”

He contends that the Board could not impose restitution, because the sentencing court only recommended that restitution in the sum of $11,459.90 be made a condition of parole.

In this court, the Board concedes1 that the sentencing court’s recommendation was not a valid restitution order and that, therefore, the Board…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WilcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API