Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. McCollister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1923No. 12496PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DICKSON, C.

This is an action in replevin commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, defendant below, filed for the purpose of recovering possession of certain furniture and fixtures specifically described in the plaintiff’s petition.

An affidavit in replevin was made and a replevin bond was approved and filed, and the writ issued. The defendant executed a redelivery bond and retained possession of the property. The pleadings were in the ordinary form.

The case was tried on the 23rd day of March, 1921, and at the close of the plaintiff’s case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Whitcomb v. OllerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Knupp v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. Gilkey-Duff Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Dematte v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API