Legal Opinion

Ratliff v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 2007No. 07-987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellees D.K.R., D.R., and A.R. move the iam. dismiss the appeal of an order terminating parental rights. They argue that Appellant Ratliff did not timely file her notice of appeal, and as such, this court is deprived of jurisdiction. Appellees point out that the notice of appeal was filed on July 17, 2007, forty-seven days after the May 31, 2007 order terminating parental rights. Appellant responds, asserting that a motion for reconsideration filed within ten days of an order terminating parental rights extends the deadline for filing of a notice of appeal by thirty days from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Martin v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. S.F. & D.F. v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schubert v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Lee v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Minor Children v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Edwards v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Edwards v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API