Legal Opinion

S.F. & D.F. v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 6, 2007No. 07-735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants S.F. and D.F., by and through their attorney, JefFRosenzweig, have filed a motion for rule on clerk, after their record was refused due to their notice of appeal’s noncompliance with Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-9(b)(2)(D). We therefore treat the instant motion as one for a belated appeal.

On May 22, 2007, the circuit court entered an order adjudicating G.A., the Appellants’ adopted child, dependent-neglected. On June 5, 2007, Mr. Rosenzweig filed a notice of appeal; however, the notice of appeal was not signed by Appellants as required by Rule 6-9 (b)(2)(D). On July 11, 2007, Mr. Rosenzweig…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Flannery v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ratliff v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Moore v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Ratliff v. ARKANSAS DEPT. HEALTH HUMAN SER.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API