S.F. & D.F. v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Per curiam
Appellants S.F. and D.F., by and through their attorney, JefFRosenzweig, have filed a motion for rule on clerk, after their record was refused due to their notice of appeal’s noncompliance with Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-9(b)(2)(D). We therefore treat the instant motion as one for a belated appeal.
On May 22, 2007, the circuit court entered an order adjudicating G.A., the Appellants’ adopted child, dependent-neglected. On June 5, 2007, Mr. Rosenzweig filed a notice of appeal; however, the notice of appeal was not signed by Appellants as required by Rule 6-9 (b)(2)(D). On July 11, 2007, Mr. Rosenzweig…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Flannery v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ratliff v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Moore v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Ratliff v. ARKANSAS DEPT. HEALTH HUMAN SER.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007