Edwards v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentCourtney Hudson Goodson, Justice
The expedition of the appellate process is our stated goal in dependency-neglect cases. Ashcroft v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 2009 Ark. 461, 2009 WL 3162287 (per curiam) (citing Ratliff v. Ark. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 371 Ark. 534, 268 S.W.3d 322 (2007)); see also Schubert v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 2009 Ark. 596, 357 S.W.3d 458. Rather than adhering to this important policy in matters involving children, the majority chooses to parse words and to reach a result that is both illogical and inconsistent with this court’s caselaw. I dissent.
In this ease, the circuit court denied…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- West v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Ratliff v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. DenmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Schubert v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009