Legal Opinion
Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 22, 1953No. 11618PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.
In a consent election pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., the truck drivers operating from petitioner’s Terre Haute bulk plant, having been found to constitute an appropriate bargaining unit, selected the Teamsters Union, AFL, as their exclusive representative for collective bargaining in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of work, and other conditions of employment. Six employees composed the unit involved. Four voted for the union representation, and two, against it. After the union’s certification on March 12, 1951, as…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Haggar Co. v. Helvering, Com'r of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brooks v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Poultry Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Tampa Electric Company v. Nashville Coal Company, Nashville Coal, Inc., and West Kentucky Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Kenneth B. McLean D/B/A Ken's Building Supplies v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.