Legal Opinion
City of Eugene v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 21, 1993No. 91-50062, 91-50073; CA A75143, A75145PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.
In these consolidated appeals, defendant seeks reversal of his convictions, pursuant to ORS 221.350, for violating section 4.860(d) of the Eugene Code by selling “joke books” on a city sidewalk. That code provision makes it an offense to
“ [s] et up or operate a vehicle, stand or place for the display or sale of merchandise, or sell, vend, or display for sale an article in the streets or on the sidewalks or in doorways or stairways of business houses, or in any other place where such activity causes congregation and congestion of people or vehicles on the streets or sidewalks.”
Section 3.338 of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Hillsboro v. PurcellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Moser v. FrohnmayerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- City of Portland v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Eugene v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Eugene v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1994