Wise v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Eric Wise v. State of Maryland, No. 73, September Term 2019. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW – HEARSAY – PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENT – POSITIVE CONTRADICTION – Nance v. State, 331 Md. 549, 569,
629 A.2d 633, 643
(1993), codified at Md. Rule 5-802.1, admits prior inconsistent statements as an exception to the hearsay rule when the proponent shows both sufficient trustworthiness of the declarant’s original statement and an inconsistency with the declarant’s testimony. The Court of Appeals held that a witness’s written description of a murder made to police before trial, was admissible under…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GaliciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Townes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025