Legal Opinion
LANQUEST CORP. v. McMANUS & DARDEN LLP
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 12, 2011No. Civil Action 11-00722 (BAH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
In this action, the plaintiff, LanQuest Corporation, seeks payment for computer network engineering, integration, and consulting services provided to the defendant law firm, McManus & Darden LLP. The plaintiff is a Maryland corporation and the defendant is a firm operating in the District of Columbia. Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs motion for summary-judgment on Count I of the Complaint, which seeks payment of an outstanding invoice in the amount of $90,541.40. For the reasons explained below, the plaintiffs motion for summary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cordoba Initiative Corporation v. DeakDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- SJ Enterprises, LLC v. Dianne QuanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- E.M. v. Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Woodland Drive LLC v. CourtovichDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021