Legal Opinion
SJ Enterprises, LLC v. Dianne Quander
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 16, 2019No. 16-CV-1235PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge:
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the landlord, Dianne Quander, waived the deadline for the tenant, SJ Enterprises', lease renewal option, by her actions and communications with the tenant after the renewal option deadline had already passed. 1
In the present case, after the lease renewal option deadline had passed but before the original contract term expired, Ms. Quander e-mailed SJ Enterprises. The subject line of the e-mail stated: "reminder of lease increase and renewal." In the body of the e-mail, Ms. Quander wrote the following:
I just…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- KRAMER ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Ikam, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Davis v. WinfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Anchorage-Hynning & Co., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. Thomas G. MoringielloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- BDO USA, LLP v. Jia-Sobota & A2Z Assoc., Inc. D/B/A Everglade ConsultingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Caesar v. Westchester CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- George v. Allen Martin Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Irazabal v. ParetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Szymkowicz v. President and Directors of the College of Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025