Legal Opinion

Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 2, 2004No. 84,2003PublishedCited by 457 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff-stockholders brought a purported class action in the Court of Chancery, alleging that the members of the board of directors of their corporation breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing to a 22-day delay in closing a proposed merger. Plaintiffs contend that the delay harmed them due to the lost time-value of the cash paid for their shares. The Court of Chancery granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss on the sole ground that the claims were, “at most,” claims of the corporation being asserted derivatively. They were, thus, held not to be direct claims of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  2. Kramer v. Western Pacific Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. White v. PanicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by457 opinions

  1. Kuroda v. SPJS Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  2. F5 Capital v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. Miller v. Brightstar Asia, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  4. Nisselson v. LernoutCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. Corwin as Trustee for Beatrice Corwin Living Irrevocable Trust v. British American Tobacco PLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

452 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API