United States v. One 1941 Chrysler Brougham Sedan
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, District Judge.
In this libel by the United States of America for the forfeiture of an automobile under Sections 781 and 782 of Title 49 U.S.C.A., the claimant, Iiarry Tennyson, Jr., doing business as the Auto-Truck Rental Company, does not challenge the Government’s proof that the automobile seized was used by one Henry Schultz to possess and conceal contraband narcotics with the intent to sell them in violation of the Federal narcotic laws and regulations, or that there was probable cause to institute the forfeiture proceeding. Further, the claimant acknowledged upon the conclusion of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Zink v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- United States v. One 1941 Plymouth Tudor Sedan, Motor No. P11-214976Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. GoodchildMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- United States v. AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Audrey Bride, , United States of America v. Madeline DefalcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- People v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. BlockerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.